Knowledge as an Addictive Drug – Why the Expert Network Industry is Growing Fast


The following is a guest article by Yishi Zuo, CEO of DeepBench, a platform which helps organizations build their own proprietary knowledge networks.    DeepBench received a minority investment from Macquarie Capital, which is also using the platform to showcase its research analysts and other staff.


Paid expert calls are an addictive product. And here is why.

In a previous job as a hedge fund investor, I used to be on the client side of expert network calls. Even if the industry expert can’t answer my questions perfectly – she knows more than I do about her field. And no matter what, I will certainly learn something new and useful.

As such, I have always walked away from expert conversations with new insights and new questions. Not only am I a satisfied customer, but the more I eat the hungrier I get.  And not only are paid expert calls addictive at the individual level, but once you start using the service, eventually your competitors have to use it too. Otherwise, they will be left behind.

A human-centric business model

First, a few quick facts about the industry:

  • Longevity: Expert networks have been around for close to 20 years.
  • Growth rate: 20%+ year.
  • Size: ~$USD 1bn in annual revenue, with a few large existing players. GLG is the biggest at ~50% of the market

The barrier to entry to starting an expert network is relatively low.  Not a lot of capital is required. All you really need is one employee with an internet connection.  However, there are a lot of nuances to connecting expertise as the business scales.

At their core, expert networks exist to help people communicate complex topics to one another.  Effective communication is rarely easily accomplished, and sometimes a great deal of human hand-holding is required to establish the trust required to enable strangers to have a deep, meaningful conversation.

One can try to replicate that trust-building via technology, but such is easier said than done. As such, the traditional expert network industry is largely a human-centric, customer service business.

Incumbent advantages

  • Affinity for the familiar – existing players have an advantage in any industry, but given the high touch nature of traditional expert networks, those advantages are particularly acute here. Users of traditional expert networks are constantly on the phone / emailing with their account managers – and over time, the relationship naturally becomes stronger.
  • Price insensitivity – traditional expert network users aren’t very price sensitive. If you are making a $50 million investment, what is an extra $500 to you for a call that could make or break the deal? If you are a consulting firm, these costs are generally passed on to your end customer so price becomes further abstracted.
  • Disconnect between end user and economic buyer – the person using expert networks is often an entry-level analyst. (I used to be one of them!) Sadly, any time + effort saved for junior analysts like us does not directly impact the economic decision makers. The average entry-level employee cares about personal career growth and is relatively risk averse. In general, actions that are client-facing and revenue-generating receive more visibility relative to actions to help the firm reduce expert network overhead—hence, this a dynamic that helps the incumbents.
  • “No one gets fired for buying from IBM” mentality – Again this is a common enterprise sales challenge for new entrants in any industry, with multiple risk-averse departments —i.e.: legal, procurement –guarding the gates. Compliance is a particularly unique gate-keeper in the expert network world. As such, adding a new vendor is a hassle that few users have the stomach to deal with. In addition, sometimes customers of the large incumbent expert networks are forced to pay up-front for annual contracts, with credits that roll-over upon renewal—another dynamic that naturally favors the existing players.

The demand side of the business

There is a bit of “a rising tide lifts all boats” dynamic in the expert network industry. Given the fundamentally addictive nature of the product, there are more and more new customers.  Non-traditional users of expert networks such as Fortune 500s, start-ups and market research firms are trying these services for the first time.

The core group of traditional expert users are investors and consulting firms, who make up 70-80% of traditional expert network demand today. And this group is well covered by entrenched market incumbents.

The supply side of the business

On a positive note for 1) new entrants to and 2) customers of the expert network industry, there are few supply-side advantages for the incumbents.  Professionals are not bound by exclusivity arrangements to any network. Many experts are on multiple networks. It relatively easy for most expert networks to acquire new supply to satisfy most of their customer requests.

Fundamentally, industry professionals enjoy being experts for 4 reasons

  1. Earn easy money – it’s easy for us to talk about something that we know a lot about, especially in a 1-on-1 setting. As long as expectations are set in advance, the threshold for success can be exceeded. So from the expert’s perspective, it’s easy money, but money isn’t the only attraction.
  2. Feeling of power –During these calls, the industry expert is at the center of attention. They get to feel powerful and important. It’s a nice feeling—like multiple shots of dopamine over the course of a 60-minute phone call. Just as knowledge is an addictive drug for the consumers, so too is it addictive for the suppliers.
  3. Feeling of altruism – The core part of what experts are doing is sharing knowledge to help another individual. We human beings are social animals, genetically altered through millennia of natural selection to be inclined to help one another. Ultimately, as thousands of industry experts have told us, there is something enjoyable about sharing their knowledge that stretches beyond money and power.
  4. Exciting break – Modern knowledge workers are intellectually curious and drawn to the new. The vast majority of the industry professionals in our network have full-time jobs. They have a daily routine, and doing a call once in a while is a nice change of pace. They are scheduled to speak with a mysterious stranger. Excitement is in the air. They have no idea where the conversation might lead. And they will likely learn new things as well.

All of these items make for a fun experience for experts and that is why the expert network business model works.

New approaches

The expert network industry will continue to grow thanks to its fundamentals, including the addictive nature of its services.  Despite the advantages of incumbents, disruptors like my firm, DeepBench, are entering the market.  Our model is to license software to help other organizations build their own knowledge networks.  Other firms are seeking to leverage technology such as artificial intelligence to streamline expert sourcing.  Like our firm, other new entrants are focused on reducing costs, which can be 30-70% cheaper than the incumbents.  However, the broader goal is to make the expert network industry even more addictive than it already is.


About Author

Yishi Zuo is CEO of DeepBench, a platform which helps organizations build their own proprietary knowledge networks. Zuo co-founded the firm with three others while completing his MBA at MIT Sloan. Previously he worked as an analyst for San Francisco hedge fund Solstein Capital and as an investment banking analyst at Goldman Sachs. Macquarie Capital made a minority investment in DeepBench in August 2019 as it adopted the platform to showcase its research analysts and other staff.

Leave A Reply